EFT Level 3 - Online
Thu 30 Oct to Thu 11 Dec
EFT Online Group Mentoring.
Thu 27 Nov
2 spaces left
Wed 03 Dec
1 space left
Wed 14 Jan 2026
Click here to see more dates
EFT Level 1 & 2 Training
Fri 09 Jan to Fri 27 Feb 2026
EFT Level 1 - Online
Fri 09 to Fri 30 Jan 2026
EFT Online Group Mentoring for Trainers
Thu 29 Jan 2026
Thu 26 Mar 2026
EFT Level 2 - Online
Fri 06 to Fri 27 Feb 2026
St Albans, Herts, UK
+44 (0)7811 484 673

There's the reasonable adult in all of us that we like to present to the world as rational, calm and in control of a situation. This person keeps their composure in handling the jibes that assail us from other people's comments. We like to think we're mature enough that their insults bounce off us.
A question I ask all new clients as part of the initial consultation process is ‘what person or event would you omit if you could relive your life’. It's not that we can change the past itself. However, we can neutralise the hold the past has on us. Their answer to this question tells so much about what is blocking them in achieving their goals at this point in time in their lives. Very often their mind delivers up an event that is related and that blocks their path forward now. Let’s examine why this could be so helpful a question to ask ourselves when working towards a goal in hand, and why releasing the negative thoughts that accompany it can deliver so much benefit.
In my therapy practice my clients talk about and work therapeutically on memories and events which bring out all manner of feelings. Everything from anger to fear to confusion comes up on the radar. But one emotion so often gives rise to a lot of worry: sadness and the resultant tears. And so many people worry that it’s wrong to cry.
A question my clients often ask me is why bother resolving particular negative emotions? They’ve been living with many of these feelings for years so why bother changing them. It’s not been a comfortable ride can’t they just carry on stuffing them away in the lockers and hidden compartments in their minds. What’s the harm in that?
Ever notice how a problem you’re working on doesn’t seem to budge much? You work at it from one angle, but the final answer seems to elude you. Maybe by taking a few steps back we can identify what parts of the puzzle need munching on, pacman like, in order to solve it.
| ⇐ Newer Posts | Older Posts ⇒ |